|
Frequently Asked Questions
Quick Links to Answers Below:
Q: What is The Cougar Fund’s mission?
A: The Cougar Fund is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization
working to protect the cougar (also referred to as
mountain lion, panther and puma) throughout the Americas.
Q: What are The Cougar Fund’s main objectives?
A:
The Cougar Fund:
- advocates for cougar management
policies based on peer-reviewed science;
- promotes
the gathering of sound science;
- educates the public on the value of cougars in
nature, the issues surrounding cougars, and how
to live & recreate
wisely in cougar country;
- calls for the
adoption of a sport-hunting subquota on female
cougars;
- is against the orphaning of kittens
when causes are not natural; and
- protects habitat
when appropriate opportunities arise.
Q:
Where does The Cougar Fund work?
A: The Cougar Fund is based in Jackson
Hole, Wyoming, but works throughout the United States. We can be
reached via e-mail at info@cougarfund.org or call 307-733-0797.
Q: With whom does The Cougar Fund work?
A: The Cougar Fund works with a variety of organizations
and individuals ranging from Game & Fish departments
on the state and local levels to concerned individuals
to independent cougar biologists to other non-profits
and community groups.
Q:
Where does The Cougar Fund get its funding?
A: The Cougar Fund receives donations and grants from
individuals as well as foundations.
Q: How can I help?
A: There are a number of things you can do. Get the
Facts. Take Action. Speak Out.
By becoming a member of
The Cougar Fund (www.cougarfund.org/join.php),
you can join our efforts to accomplish our mission. We will keep
you updated on news and developments with e-mail alerts, newsletters
and information on our web site. We’ll let you know when
critical decisions are being made relating to cougar management
policies and the appropriate times to write letters and/or attend
meetings. You can also use our web site
as a resource to help educate friends, family and neighbors about
cougars, the challenges they are facing and how to live/recreate
wisely in cougar country.
Furthermore, you can call your state game agency and
ask for information about cougar hunting regulations
and management plans. You can indicate that you are
concerned and believe that sport-hunting quotas for
all wildlife, including large carnivores like the cougar,
should based on sound scientific, peer-reviewed data.
We also believe that expressing disagreement with policies
that allow hunters to kill females -- thereby leading
to the orphaning and ultimately, the inhumane death
of countless kittens -- is very important. Finally,
ask them what they are doing about these issues.
Q: Is The Cougar Fund an animal activist group?
A: No. We are an organization that promotes conservation
of this large magnificent carnivore on the landscape
by not only promoting the use of sound science, but
also by providing for education, land conservation,
and research.
Our board of directors reflects our broad-based approach
to cougar conservation, and includes biologists, activists,
artists, hunters, and business people.
We collaborate with the public, state wildlife agencies,
sportsmen and other non-profits. We believe the public
needs to be better educated in order to ensure public
safety and embrace dialogue with all interested parties.
Q: Is The Cougar Fund anti-hunting?
A: No. Hunters serve on our board of directors as well
as participate in our work through active membership
status. And even though today fewer than 7% of Americans
hunt, and while we recognize that hunting is a value-issue,
we question the ethics of how cougars are most often
pursued, using dogs, radio-telemetry devices and motorized
vehicles. These activities also jeopardize the well
being of other wildlife, especially ungulate species
in critical wintering areas.
The Cougar Fund strives to give voice to the diverse
human values towards cougars while providing alternatives
to funding issues facing scientists and agency professionals
today.
Q: Does The Cougar Fund work with biologists?
A: Yes. In fact, The Cougar
Fund has an impressive number of biologists on its board and advisory
board: Dr. Jane Goodall (UK), Dr. Marc Bekoff (CO), Dr. Rick Hopkins
(CA), and Linda Sweanor (CO), the co-author of Desert Puma: Ecology
and Conservation of an Enduring Carnivore.
Beyond our own organization, we are in frequent contact
with biologists conducting cougar research in California,
New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho, Utah,
and Montana as well as state game agency biologists
throughout the West and mid-West. We are also in contact
with individuals who have done research in South America
and Canada.
Additionally, The Cougar Fund actively funds cougar
research.
Q: Does the Cougar Fund work with
other groups and agencies?
A: The Cougar Fund works diligently to create collaborative relationships
with state game agencies, scientist, hunters and conservationists.
Through these efforts, The Cougar Fund is able to track and respond
to the many issues facing cougars and other wildlife.
State game agencies are mandated with conserving wildlife
resources for the public. However, revenue generated
from selling hunting licenses provides the major source
of funding for these agencies, a dependency which risks
compromising the integrity of cougar management.
Q: Does The Cougar Fund take prey populations into
consideration?
A: The Cougar Fund is interested in a balanced approach
that takes all species into consideration. In fact,
we funded habitat conservation that benefits myriad
wildlife species, including elk, bison, moose, pronghorns,
mule deer, wolves, and grizzly bears. The Cougar Fund
also helps fund and supports research that examines
other factors impacting cougars and their habitat.
Q: Does sport hunting keep cougar populations in check,
thereby preventing attacks?
A: No. Presently, no scientific study has been conducted
which supports the hypothesis that sport-hunting cougars
safeguards human life. In fact a recent study by conservation
biologist, Christopher Papouchis, compared attacks and hunting
data in California as well as 10 western states where sport hunting
is allowed. Data proved that the random hunting of cougars for
sport does not increase public safety.
To the contrary, several states that support a high
level of sport take of cougars actually have a higher
rate of human attacks than California which does not
allow sport-hunting of cougars, but supports more cougar
habitat and more humans (by far) than any other western
state.
For example, Vancouver Island (a 12,000 square mile
island that supports 300,000 people) has nearly 1.5
times the number of attacks than California (no sport-hunting)
the third largest state in the U.S. California is 155,000
square miles in size (90,000 miles of cougar habitat)
and supports 35 million people, 5 million cattle and
nearly a million sheep.
Sport-hunting cougars results in unintended consequences
because of their life history strategy of breeding
year-round. Therefore, sport-harvest programs throughout
the west result in the orphaning of a significant number
of dependent young (i.e., cubs that are too young to
survive without maternal care). Interestingly, cougars
(with a few exceptions of coyotes in some states) are
the only animals we hunt in the west when they have
dependent young.
Some scientists have noted that young dispersing males
are disproportionately involved in both human-safety
incidents and depredation incidents (i.e., the killing
of livestock or pets); a segment of the population
by the way that increases in sport hunted populations.
To what degree some levels of sport hunting may or
may not exacerbate conflicts with humans is presently
untested and thus, unknown. But these facts should
illustrate the complex relationships that exist with
wildlife populations.
As currently practiced in the west, the primary purpose
of sport hunting cougars is to satisfy recreational
interest and provide a source of revenue for both game
agencies and local communities. For all intents and
purposes, we are currently managing for sport hunting
cougars and not by sport hunting cougars.
To what degree future research will provide empirical
evidence that some level of sport hunting in certain
circumstances may reduce some conflicts with humans
(e.g. result in increase growth rates for prey species
such as deer or elk, reduce depredation incidences,
etc.) is not presently known. While there remain many
unanswered questions regarding cougar biology and ecology,
considerable knowledge has been gained over the last
three decades. Based on our current knowledge of the
population dynamics of the cougar and its prey, it
is quite likely sport hunting cougars will remain primarily
a source of recreation with limited opportunities for
micro-managing conflicts with humans.
The Cougar Fund advocates management and conservation
programs based on sound scientific principles and supportable
objectives. This requires game agencies to abandon
programs based on personal biases and perceptions and
rely on the science of cougars, possibly resulting
in more conservative quotas then that might normally
advocate. However, as noted earlier, we believe that
any sport hunting program that is not explicitly designed
to minimize the harvesting of females with dependent
young is fundamentally flawed.
As noted by Francis Bacon (father of modern science)
more than 300 years ago, if we are to succeed in our
endeavors of understanding the natural world then we
must put aside our biases and perceptions. Anecdotes
and unverified sightings cannot take the place of empirically
derived data.
Q: Does The Cougar Fund want to protect cougars at
any cost to human life or safety?
A: The Cougar Fund is not opposed to removing individual
cougars who on rare occasions may attack people or
livestock, but we also recognize that the dispersal
patterns of this low-density species have been notably
affected by human development, forcing the “ghost
cat” to at times traverse human-inhabited landscapes.
The Cougar Fund is dedicated to the conservation and
preservation of the species across the western landscape.
While one of the more significant aspects of this strategy
is to minimize the loss of or fragmentation of habitats
and landscape linkages, it is also important to minimize
the killing of individual cougars that conflict with
our interest (as do many scientists who study this
species). We believe conflicts can be greatly reduced
by (though not eliminated) through education, advocating
the use of best management practices for those of us
who live and recreate in cougar country (e.g., sound
husbandry practices, put pets in at night, etc.) and
by embracing the fact that cougars are an important
and essential part of the ecosystem.
Research shows that cougars generally avoid human
dominated landscapes (this does not mean they do not
wander through areas inhabited by humans, but simply
use these areas much less than would be expected) and
rarely pose a threat to human safety. Nonetheless,
there are a number of prudent measures that all of
us can employ to reduce the rather low risk (probably
on the order of 1:100 million or more) of an adverse
encounter with a cougar even lower. These precautions
provide no guarantees, but are merely suggestions advocated
by most state game agencies. The only way to completely
avoid risk (manage it to zero) is to not live or recreate
in areas inhabited by cougars.
Q: Are there are already enough cougars or too many
cougars in the United States?
A: Not one state in the American west has sufficient
population data on cougars. The American Cougar was
once the largest-ranging land mammal in the Western
Hemisphere and inhabited all 48 continental United
States. Today, viable populations are found in just
12 states. In 11 of those, cougars are hunted for sport.
There are generally no restrictions on hunting females,
except in a few cases.
|